@pete in your recent mailing lost post you wrote, in response to this:

"> In the CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY approach, ... Based on a
> destructuring argument, it is only possible to create templates which expand
> in a finite number of steps. ....

(snipped), :

"The "finite" number of steps could be millions of transactions - "infinitely
long" for any practical purpose."

I don't understand why this is an issue. If there's a chain of ctv outputs, why does the network as a whole care?

Follow

@waxwing I'm not arguing for or against the network caring. My point there was just to argue that the rational given in the BIP was invalid, and thus better - correct - arguments need to be made.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!