RT @alexbosworth@twitter.com

According to sources, VISA requires 149 KWH of energy to perform 100,000 transactions on its global settlement network. The Lightning Network is over 1 million times more energy-efficient than this outdated network. If you are still using VISA I guess that you love wasting energy

Follow

@stevenroose So that works out to 5300 joules / transaction. That seems rather high for a centralized system: presumably they're actually counting overall usage, including overheads and energy used by network connectivity, rather than marginal energy usage per transaction.

Remember that 5300J is the energy used by 1s at 5300W. That's something like a dozen high-end computers running flat out.

· · Web · 2 · 0 · 2

@pete @stevenroose I love how articles on Bitcoin's energy usage often straight out divide the estimated power consumption of miners by on-chain transactions per second.

@verretor @pete It's like dividing the annual expenses of fort nox by the amount of transactions made with the gold in it (0?) and deciding that gold has a tx cost of infinite per tx 😅

@pete Well it involves the payment terminal, the 5 seconds of heating for the person standing next to the payment terminal, all the internet devices powering the 3-5s connection between the terminal, the VISA server, the server of the bank that issued the card 😅

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!